Over this page, I will be discussing my argument on halting advances in technology, and another for continuing the advancement in technology.
A good argument to halt human advancement in technology is that if we continue creating technologies and researching sciences to re-create living matter cloning , people will not want to die, and will clone themselves, and if they do that, combined with the new off-spring of other human beings, the world will become hugely overpopulated, than it is even now, and the world will not be able to accommodate the basic needs of everyone.
The only way to counteract this overpopulation, would either be restricting the amount of off-spring each country is allowed to produce, stop advancement in medicine, or make genocide legal, of course these kind of sacrilegious acts are against what many people believe in, even if it is only administrated to clones.
Therefore there will be arguments, that blossom into fights, then wars, even a world war, all over what people's ideation is right or wrong. If these feuds DO blossom into world wars, then it is highly likely that we will use nuclear weapons, or some other weapon of mass destruction that we have not invented yet, and wipe human kind, including clones and "real" people, into extinction.
Other technologies we create may also be catastrophic to the human race, for example, "Artificial Intelligence" may wipe "real" humans out of existence by declaring war over some un-foreseen circumstance. Scientifically created weapons like atom or hydrogen bombs are able to destroy the whole world in just few minutes.
Some people also think that it is not environmentally friendly to use all the advantages of scientific progresses.
- handkerchief othello essay.
- Related Posts!
- Essay on Science and Technology;
- essay on internet and future?
People should just learn how to use everything in a proper way. In conclusion, it must be admitted that science and technologies can lead human civilization to a perfection in living. At the same time, everything should be done in wise perspectives and to some extents, not to harm and destroy the world.
The golden quarter
Earth has sound for those, who listen. Goods and devices people use in their daily deeds, such us electric light, refrigerator, electric oven, microwave etc. Science and Technology has also affected greatly our means of transportation, by making it easy to travel from one place to another quickly.
All buses, ships, aero-planes use the benefits of new advancements. Thanks to the development of Science, men are now able to explore other planets.
Waifs & Strays | Essay on science and technology in urdu - Waifs & Strays
Nowadays, newly created satellites are used to bring a light concerning outer space. Many medicines, which are created to save million people lives, are also products of science.
- Sample Essay on Technology and Science?
- implications for practice thesis.
- procedural justice essays?
- Science and Technology – Short Essay 1..
Dresow of the University of Minnesota. A historical case is canonical when its philosophically salient features provide a good causal account of the scientific process in question. And the appreciation of relevant historical contingencies is crucial for the identification of a canonical case.
Bolinska and Martin offer an illuminating analysis of the concept of contingency, disambiguating it from the notion of chance and showing how it is crucially implicated in the historical-cum-philosophical explanation of past scientific episodes. Their essay addresses the prize question directly: what can the history of science do for the philosophy of science?
Best website to purchase a science and technology essay
Bolinska and Martin offer a subtle and original answer: working through a canonical case helps philosophers reach a clearer understanding of the philosophical issues in question and provide evidence for or against particular epistemological claims about science. The runner-up essay by Max Dresow conveys an excellent sense of the history of the methodological debates, demonstrating a firm command of the relevant literature and providing an insightful overall perspective on the problem of history—philosophy interaction.
Dresow goes beyond the delightful diagnosis of the problem that he provides, by articulating how history is used in three distinct modes of practice-based philosophy of science: the functional—analytic approach, the integrative history of the recent, and the phylogenetic approach.